Comments for Elderblog

Comment on You Win Some, You Lose Some by A Tale of Two Regulators | Elderblog

A Tale of Two Regulators | Elderblog — Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:47:04 +0000

[...] to achieve the telecommunications policy objectives set out in the Act. Canadian courts have also tended to defer to the CRTC as an expert, specialized tribunal, and courts are therefore more reluctant to interfere with CRTC decisions on [...]

Comment on CRTC Releases New ‘Net Traffic Framework by Communications Regulation is a Full-Time Job | Elderblog

Communications Regulation is a Full-Time Job | Elderblog — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:19:10 +0000

[...] to raise mixed issues affecting content and carriage, such as the recent debate over the use of Internet Traffic Management Practices, it is important that the same body of Commissioners make decisions under both [...]

Comment on New Tools for Cops, New Challenges to Privacy by Sounds Good — On Paper | Elderblog

Sounds Good — On Paper | Elderblog — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:46:23 +0000

[...] “exigent circumstances” regime was included in ss. 16 and 17 of Bill C-47 (see previous post on this bill generally), which would have required telecommunications service providers to provide [...]

Comment on We Interrupt This Program… by You Win Some, You Lose Some | Elderblog

You Win Some, You Lose Some | Elderblog — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:56:07 +0000

[...] taking a hammering this week over its handling of the fee-for-carriage issue, the CRTC finally received some good news today — in the form of a ringing endorsement from [...]

Comment on Them’s Fightin’ Words by We Interrupt This Program… | Elderblog

We Interrupt This Program… | Elderblog — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:08:44 +0000

[...] as I blogged about yesterday, Rogers questions the CRTC’s impartiality with respect to the issue of fee-for-carriage. [...]